It gets curiouser and curiouser, the deafening silence of
the mainstream lapdog media concerning the President's nonexistent economic policy. Even when O-buma had overwhelmingly superior
numbers in both houses of Congress, he and his quislings still failed to produce a written
plan of economic leadership. If the White House were to propose spending specific
amounts of money on particular programs, projects, and policies, the public
could hold them accountable, but fear of accountability gives the O-bumites performance anxiety.
Leadership IS
accountability; unfortunately, no one has told the eunuch-in-chief. This comes from the Weekly Standard. In response to a question about whether now
would be a good time for the president to present his own debt ceiling budget
plan, White House spokesman Jay Carney had this to say: "Leadership is not
proposing a plan for the sake of having it voted up or down and likely voted
down..."
To lead is to guide on a way especially by going in advance. Boy Barack is no George S. Patton riding in his
tank, proudly displaying Old Glory, and advancing into battle in the foremost
position. O-buma is more like David
Suchet’s Hercule Poirot; he is too prissy to roll up his sleeves and grapple
with the issues that plague this nation.
The O-buma administration rules via surrogates—they are
czars and regulators whom he appointed—they use deception, implication, innuendo, manipulation,
and outright treachery to achieve their goals. Regulation is manipulation, and furtive
manipulation defines the party of government. This
article describes some of it.
The Federal Register has grown 20 percent in just the last
two years, and there are another 4,225 rules already written and winding their
way through the system. And this does
not even include what Obamacare and Dodd-Frank are going to do. Just policing the regulations already in
place costs $55.4 billion a year. But
this pales in comparison to the $1.75 trillion hidden tax that regulations
place on the economy every year.
Author Jim Lacey wonders whether it is prudent to allow a
few bureaucrats in the departments of Interior and State along with the EPA to
shut down oil exploration at a time when we feel it necessary to release oil
from the country’s strategic reserve.
With Americans desperate for jobs and the nation needing economic
expansion like O-buma needs intestinal fortitude, four thugs from the National Labor
Relations Board eliminated 1000 jobs and stopped Boeing from opening a $1 billion
plant in South Carolina in an attempt to extort the company's resources to pander to overpaid union goons.
If we are to recover economically, we need a government that
can refrain from putting successful businesses into its cross-hairs. Even after federal courts ruled that the
Federal Communication Commission lacks the authority to regulate the Internet,
that agency is still applying its Net Neutrality regulation doctrine — the term
is Orwellian— to the Internet.
Laws passed by Congress should have sunset provisions requiring
periodic reauthorization. Regulatory
changes should require Congressional approval; voters can remove legislators
from office. The economic effects of
regulations and laws should be part of the legislative responsibility.
Lawmaking by regulatory bureaucrats must come to an end. The Constitution gave the power to make laws
to Congress. Congress needs to reclaim
that power. This is unlikely without a veto-proof Senate. Perhaps in 2012
we can make O-buma a one term president and send him to an orthopedic specialist who can surgically
implant a spine into his back.
May your gods be with you.
Great post! Obama is the most anti-business president in history. The regulations on top of regulations that his administration has instituted is smothering businesses. Plus, the fear of the upcoming new taxes due to Obamacare and the Bush tax cuts expiring aren't giving businesses any confidence to hire either. Obama needs to be booted out of office in 2012 or I fear that Obama will cause a 2nd depression.
ReplyDeleteRemember this - Obama likes to lead from behind. What kind of leader leads from behind? This means he is afraid to lead and he's really a follower.