The reason to engage in commerce is to make profits; as Milton
Friedman put it, the “business of business is business.” However, the primary business of government
is confiscation. At the federal level,
officials accomplish this by employing a two-pronged attack against productive Americans,
confiscatory taxation and oppressive regulation. Some prudent business owners counter these
intrusions with adaptation and innovation.
One small bank in Texas is escaping strangulating regulation by giving
up its banking charter.
This WSJ article by Robin Sidel describes one result of progressive-style
regulation. Main Street Bank lends most
of its money to small businesses and is earning decent profits. But the Kingwood, Texas, bank is about to get
out of the banking business. Receiving an
enforcement order from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation motivated Thomas Depping, Main
Street’s chairman,to seek alternatives to the government’s tightening
regulatory noose.
The bank’s business practices have been successful, making
$11 million over the past year by lending primarily to small business owners. At the same time, Main Street’s charge off
rate was significantly lower than the national average. Making money outside the tight constraints of
federal regulators’ demands ruffles bureaucratic feathers; consequently, the FDIC
slapped Main Street with a 25-page order to boost its capital, strengthen its
controls and bring in a new top
executive.
Under the Progressive President, the nanny state has taken
over the Human Resources department of this relatively tiny bank. The same hooligans who made Bank of America fire its CEO for complaining about being forced to accept an unwanted loan from the federal government
perpetrated this travesty also. They are
the same dullards who caused mass bank failure by forcing lending institutions
to give mortgages to unemployed welfare recipients. Most federal banking regulators would starve if they were forced to work in private sector banks.
Main Street made credit decisions based on a combination of
the borrower's personal-credit and business-credit histories, among other
factors. We felt that servicing small
business is something the country needs and that we're really good at it. I thought the model was working just fine, Mr.
Depping says, apparently far too well for the current profit-averse
administration.
The bank is becoming Ascentium Capital. The new entity won't be regulated and won't
be able to offer federal deposit insurance—but doesn't want to attract deposits. These business people will continue making loans according to their own standards. They are also thumbing their
collective nose at regulators and avoiding La Mordida, the cut that the federal
thugs demand for protection from their own regulators. Hopefully, the new business can stay afloat
until after the 2012 elections.
May your gods be with you.
This kind of nonsense make my blood boil. This an excellent post, rM. I 'll try to link it tomorrow.
ReplyDelete