- 1983-bombed the US Embassy in Lebanon, killing 17
- 1983-bombed a US Marine barracks, killing 241
- 1984 - Twenty-two people were killed (two of them American) and seventy were wounded when a van loaded with four hundred pounds of explosives exploded in front of the U.S. Embassy annex in Awkar, Lebanon. Islamic Jihad (code name of Hezbollah) claimed responsibility for the bombing in a call to the media.
- 1985 - TWA Flight 847 hijacked, U.S. Navy diver is killed by Hezbollah.
- 1985 - Achille Lauro hijacking, wheel-chair bound American killed by Palestinian militants.
- 1988 - Pan Am Flight 103, outbound from London for New York with 259 people aboard, was destroyed by a bomb on December 21, 1988 while over Lockerbie, Scotland. All aboard the aircraft were killed as were eleven persons on the ground.
- 1993 - World Trade Center bombing, February 26: 6 killed, 1,042 injured.
- 1993 - Attack at CIA Headquarters in McLean, Virginia, January 25: 2 killed, 3 injured.
- 1995 - Killing of two US Diplomats in Pakistan, March 8.
- Khobar Towers bombing: 19 American servicemen killed.
- 1998 - US embassy bombings: U.S. Kenya Embassy blown up, 214 killed (including 12 Americans); U.S. Tanzania Embassy blown up, 11 killed.
- 2000 - USS Cole attacked, 17 U.S. Navy sailors killed, 39 sailors injured.
- 2001 - September 11, 2001 attacks, 2,997 killed;
The traitors in the O-buma White House want to create a post-Israel scenario that will force the US to choose between engaging in a protracted, unwinnable Mideast war or surrendering without firing a shot and vacating the region altogether. Either way, this is the next big step in the progressives' planned downward gyre for America.
The Gateway Pundit's Jim Hoft reports in his article "Rewarding Evil" that the Palestinian Hamas and Fatah terrorist factions signed a truce on Wednesday May 4, 2011. Neither of the terror factions recognize Israel and neither terror organization has plans to reject terrorist activities against the Jewish people.
In recognition of this terrorist truce, Barack Obama yesterday gave the Palestinian people Old Jerusalem. Old Jerusalem contains the most sacred holy sites of Christianity. Arrogant, considering that they are not his to give away in the first place. Further, all of the Christian and Jewish holy sites will now be under Hamas control thanks to Barack Obama.
Charles Krauthammer's article "The News in Obama's Speech" reveals that O-buma attended Jimmy Carter's school of weaseling and waffling. He has come full circle from condemning the philosophies and policies of former president George W. Bush to adopting them. 'It will be the policy of the United States to promote reform across the region, and to support transitions to democracy.'
With this Barack Obama openly, unreservedly and without a trace of irony or self-reflection adopts the Bush Doctrine, which made the spread of democracy the key U.S. objective in the Middle East.
'Too many leaders in the region tried to direct their people’s grievances elsewhere. The West was blamed as the source of all ills.'
Note how even Obama’s rationale matches Bush’s. Bush argued that because the roots of 9/11 were to be found in the deflected anger of repressed Middle Eastern peoples, our response would require a democratic transformation of the region.
'We have a stake not just in the stability of nations, but in the self-determination of individuals.'
A fine critique of exactly the kind of “realism” the Obama administration prided itself for having practiced in its first two years. How far did this concession to Bush go? Note Obama’s example of the democratization we’re aiming for. He actually said:
'In Iraq, we see the promise of a multiethnic, multisectarian democracy. There, the Iraqi people have rejected the perils of political violence for a democratic process . . . Iraq is poised to play a key role in the region.'
Hail the Bush-Obama doctrine.
With this Barack Obama openly, unreservedly and without a trace of irony or self-reflection adopts the Bush Doctrine, which made the spread of democracy the key U.S. objective in the Middle East.
'Too many leaders in the region tried to direct their people’s grievances elsewhere. The West was blamed as the source of all ills.'
Note how even Obama’s rationale matches Bush’s. Bush argued that because the roots of 9/11 were to be found in the deflected anger of repressed Middle Eastern peoples, our response would require a democratic transformation of the region.
'We have a stake not just in the stability of nations, but in the self-determination of individuals.'
A fine critique of exactly the kind of “realism” the Obama administration prided itself for having practiced in its first two years. How far did this concession to Bush go? Note Obama’s example of the democratization we’re aiming for. He actually said:
'In Iraq, we see the promise of a multiethnic, multisectarian democracy. There, the Iraqi people have rejected the perils of political violence for a democratic process . . . Iraq is poised to play a key role in the region.'
Hail the Bush-Obama doctrine.
O-buma and company are dismantling the republic from within and without. They realize that backing Israel into a corner will produce one certain result: it will trigger WWIII. They remember Hafez Assad lobbing artillery shells into downtown Tel Aviv from the Golan Heights. They are also perceptive enough to realize that when it happens again, the Israelis will go nuclear.
May your gods be with you.
We certainly agree with you that abandoning Israel to support the Palestinian cause - and more gravely, with the cause go their methods - is destabilizing the Middle-East rather than the opposite.
ReplyDeleteUnless we forget, this is also a complete surrender of Hillary Clinton from everything she and Bill claimed in the past. These two dogs-of-war of politics should go out with the sunset. Certainly their hopes for any future office are now made impossible. Good riddance!